Hmm, just in case, as I don't see the example section in the debian > works, then it might be something is wrong when calling the WM. > some other term, to keep Xorg up while the term is up. > As a fallback, before calling your WM, you can also call xterm, or xinitrc you're trying for your startx attempts? xinitrc, "exec startfluxbox" for example, and > initialization files, just provide execute permissions for. > Now, this is the reason I recommended, to reduce maintaining several If there's no WM, and you're not using a DE, There's even an example in there where they > section, that ~/.xsession needs to be executable, and it's what the > If you look at the xdm man page, you'll notice as well in the overview > crashes, then you need to look at the Xorg errors. But if the WM is called, and Xorg starts and If the call for the WM is not there, then Xorg will just start xsessionrc), and I would not play around with. > Any ways if you look at the startx man page, you'll see at the bottom > wdm), and I have had no problems for around 10 years (well I no longer > work with plain startx or xdm (other DMs as well such as slim and > น I also get that message when I quit fvwm. xsessionrc works whether it is executable or not > I don't have either an ".Xdefaults" or a ".Xresources" file.
> all give above messageน: "xinit: connection to X server lost" xsession, with and without execute permission, xsessionrc, startx doesn't work, it just dumps me > executed), and then create a link from. > requires them for for several DMs if I recall correctly since it gets xinitrc with execute permissions (.xsession > Now, to make both startx and xdm (and other DMs using. Xdefaults the old days was supposed to beloaded automatically However it might be you "xrdb" them from. > Resources, whether for xterm, urxvt, or similar, usually are not Message-ID: CALUrRGf37ho_GaNO9ZRpTy-x-ni_OVOjfj_2=Sm0Rv=Uud1_8g () mail ! gmail ! com
Linux is becoming a pest only made for some gurus, really.Subject: Re. I can understand the users of Microsoft! A genial distributor since 1990 and longer all always in the country language in in each country language! Never some difficulties to see the letters of the texts. So an totally UNfriendly system did Linux become along the years.
#STARTX VS XINIT HOW TO#
In this case, it is double difficult, as the system resources are not already allow: you can't enter into X, you can't start an efficient browser, more, I have now (as I can startx with startx, now) open more than 1 (one) Terminal but I can't really read the content of then as the preinstalled Terminal resolution does only able to operate with the resources of "faceSize" and to changer that, I have to change read the man page of faceSize itself, one of the most longer man page of Linux, and that, in about microscopic size as I would have to already know how to use faceSize to permit me to read that man page of faceSize, an absolute idiotic situation!ģ (good usuable) editors (nano, vim and, and, and, and what? the forgotten xedit of course, where 1 good editor would be enough.)īut the standard installation from the main lines of Linux (also Devuan) don't secure that the user meet a Terminal with readable size for all people.Īnd they force also unexperimented users to search through all the system for a way to change that (debian-menu > selection bash > some menu text in clear xml code or not > name of the command > x-terminal-emulator > link object = lxterm > xterm (says at leat the man page from lxterm)) In essential NEW questions (this point was not so in the first years of Linux! I did never meet until now this point really on the edge) are the man pages only useful if you can read them in (one, if you have more one, of) your language(s) but they often don't exist yet in translation! So they are not known outside the English language room. More, a lot of Linux gods, creators, write some extremely and fantastic difficult English (-probably because they are themself not mother tongue English speakers-). It is really only a matter of permission (my problem actually: I am French and speak fluent German and understand well some Russian but did only "learn" the BASIC English made by C.K.
It must be an other reason (concerning "rights" perhaps?).